Equipment Leasing vs. Equipment Loans, which is better?
|A lease application can be as little as one page
for as much as $150,000 worth of equipment. Approval can occur within 24
tend to require multiple financial documents before reviewing loan
applications for approval, such as tax returns and financial statements. This
process can take several days
usually finance a portion of the equipment cost, neglecting excess costs in
acquiring the equipment such as equipment tax, shipping and handling and any
|Types of Equipment|
will generally approve any type of equipment needed, regardless of its
condition or whether it is new or used.
may be skeptical about financing equipment they are unfamiliar with, or
equipment with low collateral or potential diminishing value.
is no down payment. The first payment usually entails the first and last
payment is required, separate from the amount covered in the loan. The first
payment usually entails a down payment and the first month’s payment.
interest rate is fixed. Each payment is inflexible, being determined at the
beginning of the lease. This simplifies budgeting, since lease payments are
not susceptible to change.
interest rate fluctuates. Payments may grow more or less expensive as the
market changes, making it difficult to determine how much capital to dedicate
to loan payments for a given fiscal year.
requires no collateral assets aside from the equipment being leased. A lessor
is only legally concerned with that aspect of the business being financed.
often claim other equipment or real estate of the company as collateral to
secure the loan. This can prove costly if the borrower defaults on a loan, as
more than just the financed equipment is at stake.
assets do not appear on balance sheets, since the equipment is owned by the
leasing company. This can benefit a company’s financial ratio.
equipment is owned by the borrower and appears as an asset on the balance
sheets, which incorporates a degree of liability.
extra agreements are made between the lessor and lessee. If payments are made
on time, the lessor cannot demand immediate payment of outstanding debt or
reclaim the equipment.
covenants might be a part of a loan agreement. If any extra agreements are
broken, a bank might demand full payment of the remaining balance on the
loan, as well as impede use of the equipment being paid off. Future borrowing
may also be restricted.
usually allows for tax deduction of entire payments made toward the lease. If
the equipment keeps its relative value during the lease and is purchased at
the end, deductions can be made on depreciation thereafter.
usually allows for tax deduction on a portion of the loan as interest. Tax
deductions can also be made on the amount of depreciation attached to the
equipment. A borrower cannot deduct entire payments made on a loan.
|End of Borrowing Term|
end of the lease term, the lessee may choose to transfer the burden of
equipment depreciation to the lessor or to keep the equipment. Purchase options
for as low as $1 are offered.
end of a loan, the borrower owns the equipment and bears the risk of
equipment depreciation. If the equipment becomes obsolete during the duration
of the loan, it is still up to the borrower to make payments and dispose of
the useless equipment.